What I find is that Rigpa is stating that the letter itself is a cause of suffering and not the actions that accumulated over decades until we students felt it irresponsible not to bring this to a level where it could be heard once and for all. Sogyal Lakar has remained undetered from his “lifestyle” which he feels is nobodies business but his own for a long time even though it has brought on many public efforts to expose the clear imbalance of power and sexual demands of students which are by their nature a system of abuse. The stories that come do not sound like experienced students engaged in some kind of pure ritual of tantric nature. They are stories of someone who has such high views that he feels he can do anything and just assume it benefits anyone he does it to harmful or not because he professes to only do it with the intention to help. The more excuses and distractions come the worse this looks and I hope it is all resolve by confronting the bad actor and not by using his resources as a kind of public legal defense fund because he fears prosecution.
The remaining 3 characters in this field are for the optional input of a Part identity and which allows several Export Declarations to have the same core DUCR . It is this, in combination with the (up to) 35 character UCR which must be unique. An example of Part identity use would be a large consignment covered by a single DUCR but being exported on say 3 vessels over a period of weeks or months. Ideally, the DUCR would use a common identifier in the trader’s records, but each movement of the goods would have a separate CHIEF declaration, using the same DUCR but designated as Part 001, 002 and 003.